Hello Readers
Here is a link to the videos that I promised. go to you tube and type in Colby626 & Pastor Jeff Jones, and it will show you a list of videos you can watch.
Blessings on you during the snow storm of 2016
Pastor Jeff
reflections on spiritual life, help for the journey a pilgrimage of growing faith and overcoming death. And a chance to dialogue about that.
Saturday, January 23, 2016
Monday, January 18, 2016
Remembering Marting Luther King Jr. on this special day
I am sharing this blog post from James Emery White, a pastor whose books and thoughts I truly appreciate, for this special day. Well said, and a lot to think about.
Blessings
Pastor Jeff
Today the nation celebrates
what would have been Martin Luther King, Jr.’s 87th birthday. Sharon Shahid once
openly wondered whether his famed essay, Letter
from Birmingham Jail, “would have made such a lasting impression or had as
powerful an impact if today’s instant communication devices existed, and if
someone smuggled a BlackBerry or a mobile phone into his cell. What would have
happened if he texted the famous letter or used Twitter – in 140 characters or
fewer?”
“Instead of a legacy,”
she suggests, “he most likely would have started a conversation.”
And that’s all.
“King’s voice – so
poignant and crystal-clear in print – simply would lose its resonance in cyber
ink…. A tweet would have faded into ether minutes after it was released,
drowned out by a thousand other disparate musings.”
But that is the least
of the challenges our current context would bring to King’s words making an
impact in our day. Why? It was a prophet’s voice based on a thoroughgoing
Christian worldview.
And today, there are
few such prophets.
Consider the term
itself, worldview, from the German Weltanschauung
(literally “world perception”), which suggests more than a set of ideas by
which you judge other ideas. It is, as Gene Edward Veith has written, “a way to
engage constructively the whole range of human expression from a Christian
perspective.” Or as Jonathan Edwards once contended, arguably the greatest intellect
America has ever produced, the basic goal of any intellect is to work toward
“the consistency and agreement of our ideas with the ideas of God.”
Now
consider the worldview questions posed by Charles Colson and Nancy Pearcey,
based on creation, the fall, and redemption: Where did we come from and who are
we? What has gone wrong with the world? What can we do to fix it? How now shall
we live?
Reflect on the response
to the first and most foundational of these questions – where did we come from?
There are a limited number of answers at our disposal: We came about by chance
(the Naturalist contention), we don’t really exist (the Hindu response), or we
were spoken into existence by God.
Even if one makes more
obscure suggestions, such as Cambridge physicist Stephen Hawking (that we were
seeded here by another race of beings from another planet), one would then have
to account for their existence.
So for the Christian,
the answer to “Where did we come from and who are we?” gives a foundation for
thinking that no other answer gives. Because we were created, there is value in
each person. There is meaning and purpose to every life. There is Someone above
and outside of our existence who stands over it as authority.
Because of this answer,
Martin Luther King, Jr., could write the immortal words found in his jailhouse
correspondence:
“...there are two types of law: just and unjust.... A just
law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An
unjust law is a code that is out harmony with the moral law.... Any law that
uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is
unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the
soul and damages the personality.”
King’s argument was
based on the worth of a human being bestowed by God regardless of what other
humans might have to say; King laid claim to a law above man’s law. No other
worldview would have given King the basis for such a claim.
And from such a
worldview, the world was changed.
But would such a
worldview get a hearing today?
Hardly.
And there lies the
irony; as a culture, we celebrate a man’s Christian convictions that were used
to change our culture in the past, while simultaneously rejecting those values
as a part of shaping our culture for the future.
Which means the next
young leader with passion and conviction may have a dream, but if it’s based on
King’s worldview, it will never be heard. Or if heard, will never spark the
cultural revolution it did before.
Not because it would be
tweeted instead of written.
But because it would be
based on something not of this world that the world no longer recognizes.
James
Emery White
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)