Church & Politics by James E. White

Neck-deep in the presidential election cycle, it seems a good time to talk about the Christian and politics.

 

Let’s begin with the obvious. If there are two words that can raise the temperature in any room, they are “religion” and “politics;” or as Linus would add, “…and the Great Pumpkin.”

 

When it comes to religion and politics, we have deep convictions and opinions, denominations and parties, divides and loyalties. Christians in particular can get confused about how to engage the political realm.

 

On the one hand, we know that politics matter, as there are issues inextricably intertwined with politics that we are called to care deeply about as Christians: the definition of marriage, when life begins and ends, care for the poor, the treatment of the oppressed.

 

These are deeply spiritual matters and, as a result, deeply spiritual concerns. If politics touch on these issues, they touch on us as Christians.

 

But we’ve also been burned by politics - whether from embarrassment over the excesses of the religious right during the 1980s, or the groups that shout out “God hates fags,” or those who scream at women entering abortion clinics. In fact, we are so burned by politics, and often associated with it, that it’s become one of Christianity’s biggest image problems.

 

So here we are in an election year when, in just a few months, we’ll choose a new president and a slate of other elected officials.

 

What to do?

 

It might be healthy to refresh our thinking on what churches and their leaders can and cannot legally do. Here are some reminders, as once compiled by Christianity Today:

 

Since 1954, when then Senator Lyndon Johnson proposed and successfully passed legislation prohibiting nonprofits from either opposing or endorsing a candidate – after being opposed himself by a nonprofit organization – churches may not directly endorse or oppose a political candidate.

 

The key word is “directly.”

 

No church can officially say, “We endorse John Doe,” or “We oppose Jane Doe.” Not only that, but a pastor cannot send out a personal written endorsement on church letterhead. Political signs cannot be displayed on church property.

 

The only participation in the political process that is allowed is “indirect.”

 

Here is what that means -

 

As a pastor, I can personally endorse a candidate. I can tell you who I like in the church parking lot or the grocery store aisle in normal conversation. I just can’t do it directly from the podium.

 

As a pastor, I can also personally work for a candidate and contribute financially to their campaign, but the church itself cannot contribute financially with church funds even if approved by the membership.

 

As a pastor, I can endorse a candidate in print, and use my title and the church I am affiliated with.

 

As a pastor I am free to speak and teach on moral and social issues that may be integral to the political debate, such as abortion, gay marriage and economic matters – even if, by implication, it throws support toward one candidate and critiques another.

 

As a church, we can also take official positions on such issues as long as we don’t directly endorse or oppose a candidate in the process.

 

As a church, we can organize voter registrations and drives as long as they are directed at all eligible voters and not toward just one political party.

 

As a church, we can hold forums where candidates are invited to address the issues. If a candidate were to visit our church, they could be publicly recognized and introduced. We can even host candidates to speak from our stage, as long as that candidate is not directly endorsed nor urges the church to vote for them.

 

As a church, we can distribute non-partisan voter guides giving information on where each candidate stands on the issues.

 

And, of course, as a church we can offer our campus as a voting station.

 

This is what a church, and its leadership, is currently allowed to do. How much or how little of this an individual church avails itself of during an election cycle varies from church to church. At Meck, we steer clear of anything overt for the simple reason that we are passionate about reaching the unchurched, and being “associated” with politics provides an unnecessary and avoidable barrier to presenting the gospel. And in our culture, even the most innocent of connections or appearances can make this association.

 

So do I speak openly about issues? Yes, very openly, but no one who would hear me speak on, say, gay marriage, abortion, economic justice or racial reconciliation, would feel the talk was in any way meant to be political.

 

And in truth, such talks never are. It’s just teaching and applying the Bible to all of life and culture. Let the political chips fall where they may. I’m a Bible guy, and that’s what I’m going to teach. If such teaching informs the political involvement of the Christ follower, then so be it – and good if it does, for that matter. But that’s not the primary purpose.

 

So what of the individual Christian?

 

Politics can be a dizzying affair and is increasingly difficult to navigate. Clearly God is not aligned with any political party. There is a fascinating passage in the Old Testament where an angel of the Lord comes to Joshua. The Bible records that “Joshua went up to him and asked, ‘Are you for us or for our enemies?’ ‘Neither,’ he replied, ‘but as commander of the army of the LORD I have now come’” (Joshua 5:13-14, NIV).

 

Soak that one in.

 

Yet there are stands that one or both parties may take on a specific issue that reflect the Kingdom of God or do not; issues about the sanctity of human life, the definition of marriage and family, how the poor are treated, and whether those who are victimized are protected. Based on your reading of the Bible, you may find that one party gets one set of issues right (say on sexual morality) and another party gets another set of issues right (say on economic morality).

 

And to add to the complexity, on some of these issues thoughtful Christians disagree about how best to flesh out the principles of the Bible in addressing various matters; such as with immigration or welfare, when a war is just and when it is not, or how best to care for the environment.

 

But however you vote, vote.

 

Christians should dig deep into the issues, even deeper into the Scriptures, and emerge with a resolve to care deeply and work passionately within the civic circle of affairs.

 

They should run for office when God calls them to it, and strive to make a difference in that realm. Not as a partisan Democrat or Republican, though they may be aligned with such a party, but primarily as a Christian attempting to be salt and light.

 

Because it matters.

 

Those who turn their back on politics do so at great risk. Namely, the risk of abdicating their role in standing against the onslaught of evil.

 

In my office I have a small, brass bust of Winston Churchill. It is the only such sculpture I own. I purchased it at his birthplace at Blenheim Palace in England. It reminds me of a life that reflected passion, resolve and conviction against rank evil.

 

Almost singlehandedly, Churchill resisted one of the greatest assaults of evil the world has ever known, willing the world to concern and then victory. His words to the English people, particularly during that dark summer of 1940, still stir the human heart:

 

"Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this Island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known or cared for, will sink in to the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science. Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties and so bear ourselves that if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years men will still say, 'This was their finest hour.'"

 

Later, biographers would call it his finest hour. And it was.

 

Compare that to the confession of Martin Niemoller, a pastor in Germany who initially sent a telegram congratulating Hitler on his rise to power. Later, when he came to see the truth, he reflected on his political naiveté with these words:

 

"In Germany, they came first for the communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up became I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up."

 

Let that never be our confession. But if it ever is, it will be because we somehow thought that the Christian must never enter the world of politics.

 

The truth is that the Christian must.

 

Why?

 

The world is depending on it.

 

James Emery White

 

Sources

 

On what a pastor, or church, can “do” politically (as outlined above), see “Politics from the Pulpit,” posted January 7, 2008, on the “Out of Ur” blog as compiled by Allen R. Bevere; read online here.

 

Churchill’s speech was delivered on June 18, 1940, and is quoted here from Norman Rose, Churchill: The Unruly Giant (New York: The Free Press, 1994), p. 329.

 

Martin Niemoller’s confession was actually a poem and has been represented in various ways with minor variations. This is the version that Niemoller himself said he preferred, when asked by Richard John Neuhaus in 1971, as relayed in the November 2001 issue of First Things.

    

About the Author

 

James Emery White is the founding and senior pastor of Mecklenburg Community Church in Charlotte, NC, and the ranked adjunctive professor of theology and culture at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, where he also served as their fourth president. His latest book, The Rise of the Nones: Understanding and Reaching the Religiously Unaffiliated, isavailable on Amazon. To enjoy a free subscription to the Church and Culture blog, visit ChurchAndCulture.org, where you can view past blogs in our archive and read the latest church and culture news from around the world. You can also find out information about the 2016 Church and Culture Conference. Follow Dr. White on twitter @JamesEmeryWhite.

On Running for Congress

   Hello Blog readers

Yes, I'm running for Congress, Republican for Md. 8th District. At the moment against four others before the primary. I have had a lot of questions asked of me about why. I have had several people become very worried that it will ruin my congregation because of this. I would like to address both of those here.

   First I am running because I am sick and tired and angry about the gridlock in Congress. I heard Mike McCurry, Bill Clinton's press secretary and now a professor at Wesley Seminary tell us at Leadership Days, that there are really only 13 congressman who will routinely cross the aisle and vote for a good idea from the other party. Twenty years ago almost 300 of the 435 would cooperate or compromise to get legislation passed. Who ever the President was, they would work together. Now there seems to be such a digging in of heels that nothing is getting done. I am running because I believe very passionately that Abraham Lincoln is right we need a government "Of the people, By the people, For the people." A representative should know and consider the people again, not career or pressured by the PAC that put them there.

   I'm running because I think we have the greatest nation on the the earth. Not perfect, but with a dedication to the principles of the Constitution and the understanding of history we can have great days ahead of us. We need a return to respect for one another. We need a return to a realization that the best ideas are shaped with dialogue and compromise so that more can be accomplished. We can't do this alone. We can do better with common sense, for the common good.

   I don't have the answers for all of the challenges we face. But I believe we can work on them together and it will be somewhere in between what any one side thinks will work. I think a lot of our challenges can be negotiated, especially with an eye toward how this great nation got here in the first place. With respect, with a welcoming of new ideas and new energy coming into the country by people who really wanted to be here with us.

   I believe a lot us want the government to solve some of the problems that we ourselves need to work on. We need a return to the greatness of neighbors helping neighbors, of strong communities working together. Helping each other up when they are down. Looking out for one another, connecting to one another.


   Now some thoughts about hurting the congregation because I am running for Congress. I believe this is a God thing. And I believe as I have preached when you see something that needs fixing and don't do something about it, you are only lukewarm in your faith and not responding to God's leading. I wish more people would trust that God can do great things. I wish people would trust that God can accomplish work for the Kingdom with the help of the Holy Spirit leading a congregation, not the earthly work of a pastor. I am committed to my congregation and want all of us to grow in our faith so that we become the people God wants. The race to Congress is a very long shot, and I'm likely to be out of the race after the Primary and back full time as pastor. It's only a few more weeks.

   But should a miracle of David versus Goliath occur and I find myself still on the race for Congress, we will find good ways to do what needs to be done in the congregation. The whole idea is that we are a body of Christ. Christ is the head and the leader, and each of us have a part to play in sharing God's love in our community. Each of us have a role in that Body of Christ that will continue, whether I'm still running for Congress or not. I will continue to emphasize that the church belongs to Jesus, and we all take our leadership from him. We will be able to do all of this, if we but trust in God.

   Thank you all for your prayers and your concerns. And may God continue to bless us everyone.

Pastor Jeff

Video Sermons

Hello Readers

Here is a link to the videos that I promised. go to you tube and type in Colby626 & Pastor Jeff Jones, and it will show you a list of videos you can watch.

Blessings on you during the snow storm of 2016

Pastor Jeff

Remembering Marting Luther King Jr. on this special day

I am sharing this blog post from James Emery White, a pastor whose books and thoughts I truly appreciate, for this special day. Well said, and a lot to think about.

 

Blessings

 

Pastor Jeff

 

Would Martin Luther King, Jr. Be Heard Today?

 

Today the nation celebrates what would have been Martin Luther King, Jr.’s 87th birthday. Sharon Shahid once openly wondered whether his famed essay, Letter from Birmingham Jail, “would have made such a lasting impression or had as powerful an impact if today’s instant communication devices existed, and if someone smuggled a BlackBerry or a mobile phone into his cell. What would have happened if he texted the famous letter or used Twitter – in 140 characters or fewer?”

 

“Instead of a legacy,” she suggests, “he most likely would have started a conversation.”

 

And that’s all.

 

“King’s voice – so poignant and crystal-clear in print – simply would lose its resonance in cyber ink…. A tweet would have faded into ether minutes after it was released, drowned out by a thousand other disparate musings.”

 

But that is the least of the challenges our current context would bring to King’s words making an impact in our day. Why? It was a prophet’s voice based on a thoroughgoing Christian worldview.

 

And today, there are few such prophets.

 

Consider the term itself, worldview, from the German Weltanschauung (literally “world perception”), which suggests more than a set of ideas by which you judge other ideas. It is, as Gene Edward Veith has written, “a way to engage constructively the whole range of human expression from a Christian perspective.” Or as Jonathan Edwards once contended, arguably the greatest intellect America has ever produced, the basic goal of any intellect is to work toward “the consistency and agreement of our ideas with the ideas of God.”

 

Now consider the worldview questions posed by Charles Colson and Nancy Pearcey, based on creation, the fall, and redemption: Where did we come from and who are we? What has gone wrong with the world? What can we do to fix it? How now shall we live?

 

Reflect on the response to the first and most foundational of these questions – where did we come from? There are a limited number of answers at our disposal: We came about by chance (the Naturalist contention), we don’t really exist (the Hindu response), or we were spoken into existence by God.

 

Even if one makes more obscure suggestions, such as Cambridge physicist Stephen Hawking (that we were seeded here by another race of beings from another planet), one would then have to account for their existence.

 

So for the Christian, the answer to “Where did we come from and who are we?” gives a foundation for thinking that no other answer gives. Because we were created, there is value in each person. There is meaning and purpose to every life. There is Someone above and outside of our existence who stands over it as authority.

 

Because of this answer, Martin Luther King, Jr., could write the immortal words found in his jailhouse correspondence:

 

“...there are two types of law: just and unjust.... A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out harmony with the moral law.... Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality.”

 

King’s argument was based on the worth of a human being bestowed by God regardless of what other humans might have to say; King laid claim to a law above man’s law. No other worldview would have given King the basis for such a claim.

 

And from such a worldview, the world was changed.

 

But would such a worldview get a hearing today?

 

Hardly.

 

And there lies the irony; as a culture, we celebrate a man’s Christian convictions that were used to change our culture in the past, while simultaneously rejecting those values as a part of shaping our culture for the future.

 

Which means the next young leader with passion and conviction may have a dream, but if it’s based on King’s worldview, it will never be heard. Or if heard, will never spark the cultural revolution it did before.

 

Not because it would be tweeted instead of written.

 

But because it would be based on something not of this world that the world no longer recognizes.

 

James Emery White

 

* Editorial Note: This blog was originally published in 2011. The team at ChurchAndCulture.org wanted to share it with you again as we celebrate Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday.

Christ the King Sunday Thoughts

Here is the collection of notes from this past Sunday's sermon for Christ the King Sunday. It's jumbled but I heard from enough people who thought they would like to think about it that I would pass  the thoughts I had onto others to wrestle with.

KINGDOM OF GOD

Instead, the church must embrace and embody a new narrative driven by Kingdom concerns instead of church issues.

But if we respond to Jesus’ call to live as Kingdom agents everywhere we go , we will experience the joy of seeing God at work. Once you’ve witnessed a few resurrections, everything else pales in comparison!

most of what God does happens outside the church. The church has a vital role to play, but the church is not the center of the action.

Christianity’s greatest period of vulnerability and political weakness was the time of its most explosive growth. It became a magnet to others as well as a model of compassion. Likewise, rather than lecturing the world, we need to show a different and better way to live in the world, which includes seeking, as the prophet Jeremiah described it, “the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile” (Jer. 29:7). This view of power places average Christians on the mainstage of cultural influence. The loss of political sway in some areas empowers the everyday example of believers

“Apocalyptic and hysterical rhetoric is inappropriate for people who are children of the King,” James Forsyth, senior pastor at McLean Presbyterian Church, told us. “Christians should not be characterized by white knuckles of fear and terror.” God’s kingdom has a set of values that should shape us and instill a sense of mission; but God’s purposes ultimately don’t hinge on us. We can rest in the knowledge that God is in control and that things will unfold according to his will and ways.

If we understand this moment of cultural weakness in the right way—if we show joy and grace, serenity and hope, even while traveling on roads marked by difficulty—this moment can turn out to be not a calamity but a greater and grander stage for the true, enduring, and life-giving message of the gospel.

We want to use the time in church to prepare for Kingdom of God work out there. The end all be all of church is not to gather members, to save some one and feel like we are finished. But to prepare kingdom agents for working in the world. Disciple making prepares us for doing some awesome in the world outside of the church. It's tough for us to hear that, because we worry that our own church is in such need. To focus outside seems like neglect.

Jesus taught us to pray for the Kingdom to come. We must keep working on that possibility.

This hymn, by Carolyn Winfrey Gillette played a part in the pastoral prayer this Sunday as we prayed for the victims and their families who were in Paris for the destruction of so many.

O God, Our Words Cannot Express

ST. ANNE CM ("Our God, Our Help in Ages Past") (MIDI)

 

O God, our words cannot express 

The pain we feel this day.

Enraged, uncertain, we confess

Our need to bow and pray.

 

We grieve for all who Please their lives...

And for each injured one.

We pray for children, husbands, wives

Whose grief has just begun.

 

O Lord, we're called to offer prayer

For all our leaders, too.

May they, amid such great despair,

Be wise in all they do.

 

We trust your mercy and your grace;

In you we will not fear!

May peace and justice now embrace!

Be with your people here!

 I

Tune: Attr. William Croft, 1708.

Text: Copyright © 2001 by Carolyn Winfrey Gillette.

Email:  bcgillette@comcast.net   Web site:  www.carolynshymns.com 

Our Bosses

   who we are influenced by, who shapes our behavior, who do we try to emulate, who were the people we were trying to be like? Who do we take our cues from for how we act. When I was little I wanted to be Superman. When a teenager, I wanted to be like the jocks I saw who were able to have friends and date the cute girls. Later on it's others who I thought I should impress. But it's not supposed to be liike that, but we should emulate Jesus and the ways of the Kingdom.

The Church

   Jesus started the church to help train disciples to work for the Kingdom of God. 3 times Jesus mentions 3 as assembly. 150 times Jesus talks about the Kingdom of God/Heaven. We have focused our efforts at the church, getting people to become members, to help people be comforted in times of trouble, to help make the building a good place. Even our own bosses and other pastors measure what we are doing well by the number of people in our pews, the size of our buildings and the amounts of our budget. We are even chastised if we aren't growing the numbers of members. Not much talk about Kingdom influences. The church should be the training ground for living the Monday through Saturday life in the kingdom and with kingdom values being shared with all others.

Parable of the Life-Saving Station  This is a good story about what happens to many churches, they start off well and then grow comfortable as a club.




A Parable of a Lighthouse

  On a dangerous seacoast where shipwrecks often occur there was a once a crude little life-saving station. The building was just a hut, and there was only one boat, but the few devoted members kept a constant watch over the sea, and with no thought for themselves, they went out day or night tirelessly searching for the lost. 

  Many lives were saved by this wonderful little station, so that it became famous. Some of those who were saved, and various others in the surrounding areas, wanted to become associated with the station and give of their time and money and effort for the support of its work. New boats were bought and new crews were trained. The little life-saving station grew.

  Some of the new members of the life-saving station were unhappy that the building was so crude and so poorly equipped. They felt that a more comfortable place should be provided as the first refuge of those saved from the sea.

  So they replaced the emergency cots with beds and put better furniture in an enlarged building. Now the life-saving station became a popular gathering place for its members, and they re-decorated it beautifully and furnished it as a sort of club.

  Less of the members were now interested in going to sea on life-saving missions, so they hired life boat crews to do this work.

  The mission of life-saving was still given lip-service but most were too busy or lacked the necessary commitment to take part in the life-saving activities personally.

  About this time a large ship was wrecked off the coast, and the hired crews brought in boat loads of cold, wet, and half-drowned people.

  They were dirty and sick, and some of them had black skin, and some spoke a strange language, and the beautiful new club was considerably messed up. So the property committee immediately had a shower house built outside the club where victims of shipwreck could be cleaned up before coming inside.

  At the next meeting, there was a split in the club membership. Most of the members wanted to stop the club's life-saving activities as being unpleasant and a hindrance to the normal life pattern of the club.

  But some members insisted that life-saving was their primary purpose and pointed out that they were still called a life-saving station. But they were finally voted down and told that if they wanted to save the life of all the various kinds of people who were shipwrecked in those waters, they could begin their own life-saving station down the coast. They did.

  As the years went by, the new station experienced the same changes that had occurred in the old. They evolved into a club and yet another life-saving station was founded.

  If you visit the seacoast today you will find a number of exclusive clubs along that shore. Shipwrecks are still frequent in those waters, only now most of the people drown.

Author unknown

Adapted by Steve Rudd

The Kingdom

we have for a long time emphasized just the church and it's needs, and we do have them. BUT

  Jesus challenges us to work on developing our discipleship so we engage the world we live in with the influences of the Holy Spirit to bring about the Kingdom. For God so loved the World...

   May we be blessed by John Wesley's teaching on engaging in a world we don't always agree with and learn that love should triumph over total consensus as these quotes instruct us.

  We may not all agree on things, but we can all agree on love for one another is the most important thing. 

  Let us commit to growing in our faith so we can influence the world we live in to become more like the Kingdom of God.

Fruit of The Spirit Joy

JOY

Usually, we employ this word to communicate our intense satisfaction, our sense of well-being and our underlying contentment at having experienced something for which we have earnestly longed, something that we have deeply desired.

One of the most powerful of these practices and the one that may be most responsible for inhibiting the cultivation of Christian joy is the practice of advertising.

the significance of the etymological connection between the Greek word for "grace" (charis) and the New Testament word most commonly translated as "joy" (chara). Both words developed from the same root, and both imply the activity of freely taking delight in something or someone beyond one's self.

As Evelyn Underhill writes: "Real love always heals fear and neutralizes egotism, and so, as love grows up in us, we shall worry about ourselves less and less, and admire and delight in God and his other children more and more, and this is the secret of joy."2

This emphasis on the outward movement of joy is carried over into the New Testament, where healing and restoration of wholeness are an occasion sion for joy and praise.

For me, I define JOY in two ways…

1) Internal Joy: living with a high level of self-worth that is not based off circumstances. I’m not talking about being arrogant. Rather, having internal “confidence” in who I am, no matter what others say or do.

2) External Joy: offering help and hope to others.

But perhaps most significantly, joy is a defining characteristic of the life of God. The parables of Luke 15 remind us that God also rejoices when those who were lost are found. God has always longed for the reconciliation of all creation.

O Lord, far be it from me to think that whatever joy I feel makes me truly happy. For there is a joy that is not given to those who do not love you, but only to those who love you for your own sake. You yourself are their joy. Happiness is to rejoice in you and for you and because of you. This is true happiness and there is no other. Those who think that there is another kind of happiness look for joy elsewhere, but theirs is not true joy.3  St. Augustine

Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude you, revile you, and defame you on account of the Son of Man. Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, for surely your reward is great in heaven; for that is what their ancestors did to the prophets. (Lk 6:22-23)

"My brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of any kind, consider it nothing but joy, because you know that the testing of your faith produces endurance; and let endurance have its full effect, so that you maybe mature and complete, lacking in nothing" (Jas 1:2-4).

advertising both plays on and helps create our contemporary confusions and anxieties about who we are and whether we have worth.

Furthermore, because we believe we are entitled to pursue happiness and because our culture defines happiness in terms ofwhatwe possess,we believe we are entitled to acquire and accumulate whatever possessions we believe will make us happy. The result, as many of us can well attest, is that our lives (not to mention our closets, garages and attics) are often cluttered with stuff that promised to bring us happiness but didnt and doesn't.

When we gather for worship, therefore,we are focusing our attention on that which is our chief end. Such gatherings should be marked by the joy that comes from doing what we were created to do.

The source of our joy as Christians is God and God's reconciling work. Even the Old Testament rings out with psalms of joy to the God who saves.

Rather, what is being aroused in many cases is a desire for desiring, a desire that makes contentment with who one is and what one has all but impossible.

Fruit of the Spirit Peace

PEACE

shalom/peace refers to the state of well-being, wholeness and harmony that infuses all of one's relationships. Such a view of peace is inherently social; to be at peace only with oneself is not to experience shalom in all its fullness.

As

Establishing and sustaining wholeness in all one's relationships is no easy thing. To be in right relationship with God and one's fellow creatures one must consistently do what is right, what God desires, what God requires.

Peace for overcoming storms

Moving toward a new understanding of Shalom or Wholeness

Willing to be invested in increasing peace

Into the midst of this divisive culture, the gospel of Jesus brings an alternate perspective. “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.” or from the apostle Paul, “If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.”

A prayer attributed to Francis of Assisi: “Lord, make us instruments of your peace. Where there is hatred, let us sow love; where there is injury, pardon; where there is discord, union; where there is doubt, faith; where there is despair, hope; where there is darkness, light; where there is sadness, joy. Grant that we may not so much seek to be consoled as to console; to be understood as to understand; to be loved as to love. For it is in giving that we receive; it is in pardoning that we are pardoned; and it is in dying that we are born to eternal life. Amen.” 43

The root meaning of the word “peace” comes from the Hebrew concept of “shalom.” Shalom refers to a state of well-being, wholeness and harmony; a connectedness that infuses all of one’s relationships, with God, each other and the world.

I hope these random thoughts will help you think about making peace a more important part of your life and your spiritual journey.

blessings on you as you travel

Pastor Jeff